Difference between revisions of "Alpha conversion"
From HaskellWiki
(Can somebody word this better?) 
BrettGiles (talk  contribs) (My 2 cents on wording.) 

Line 1:  Line 1:  
−  An ''alpha conversion'' (also written ''α conversion'') 
+  An ''alpha conversion'' (also written ''α conversion'') is a renaming variables. 
For example, suppose we have an expression such as 
For example, suppose we have an expression such as 

Line 11:  Line 11:  
This is clearly the same function, even though it uses different variable names. This process of renaming variables is ''alpha conversion''. 
This is clearly the same function, even though it uses different variable names. This process of renaming variables is ''alpha conversion''. 

−  +  Note that alpha conversion is not as simple as it first seems. We must be careful to avoid ''name capture''. For example, if we rename <hask>x</hask> to <hask>y</hask> in <hask>\x > x + y</hask> then we end up with <hask>\y > y + y</hask>, which is not the same function! 

[[Category:Glossary]] 
[[Category:Glossary]] 

+  
+  Also see [[Lambda calculus]] and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_calculus wikipedia lambda calculus article]. 
Revision as of 22:15, 29 January 2007
An alpha conversion (also written α conversion) is a renaming variables.
For example, suppose we have an expression such as
\x y > 2*x*x + y
and we change this to
\a b > 2*a*a + b
This is clearly the same function, even though it uses different variable names. This process of renaming variables is alpha conversion.
Note that alpha conversion is not as simple as it first seems. We must be careful to avoid name capture. For example, if we rename x
to y
in \x > x + y
then we end up with \y > y + y
, which is not the same function!
Also see Lambda calculus and the wikipedia lambda calculus article.